www.trademarkia.com/sonic-the-hedgehog-74142016.html
be cuse if u look on the bottom of the page u see the sonic 20 anniversary weard ? i no its old and out dated 1993 but l@@K
does this meen sega does not own sonic any more?
Moderator: pcwzrd13
-
- Graffiti Grind
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Re: does this meen sega does not own sonic any more?
Nope. Sega of America hasn't filed a domain name since the Dreamcast days.
-
- Dead House
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:33 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: does this meen sega does not own sonic any more?
I would have to say sega will never let sonic go...he's the face of the company...it would be like microsoft scrapping halo...
-
- Feet of Fury
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 6:20 pm
Re: does this meen sega does not own sonic any more?
Looks like whoever wrote the Yahoo! Games blog thinks Sega needs to give Sonic a rest...
http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in ... 37661.html
Quote:
"Sonic the Hedgehog
People have been calling for Sonic's head for nearly a decade now, and for good reason: the blue blur just ain't what he used to be.
Beginning with 2003's Sonic Heroes (or thereabouts), a string of pretty lousy games started gnawing away on the mascot's legacy. 2006's Sonic the Hedgehog was a disaster, as was 2008's Sonic Unleashed. If you typed "which game franchises should die" into a search engine in 2009, Sonic's was the first name on every list.
To be fair, though, he's made a decent comeback of late. Sonic Colors for the Wii was a solid platformer, as was the recently released throwback game, Sonic Generations. But despite these modest gains, it's time for the hedgehog to go on administrative leave. He's been running non-stop for over 20 years now. Give him — and us -- a break, Sega."
I agree about the 2006 Sonic the Hedgehog game and, to some extent, Sonic Heroes as well. But I think Sega has started to repair the damage caused by those games, by releasing Sonic Colors and Sonic Generations. As long as Sega keeps the quality up then I see no reason for that to be necessary.
http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in ... 37661.html
Quote:
"Sonic the Hedgehog
People have been calling for Sonic's head for nearly a decade now, and for good reason: the blue blur just ain't what he used to be.
Beginning with 2003's Sonic Heroes (or thereabouts), a string of pretty lousy games started gnawing away on the mascot's legacy. 2006's Sonic the Hedgehog was a disaster, as was 2008's Sonic Unleashed. If you typed "which game franchises should die" into a search engine in 2009, Sonic's was the first name on every list.
To be fair, though, he's made a decent comeback of late. Sonic Colors for the Wii was a solid platformer, as was the recently released throwback game, Sonic Generations. But despite these modest gains, it's time for the hedgehog to go on administrative leave. He's been running non-stop for over 20 years now. Give him — and us -- a break, Sega."
I agree about the 2006 Sonic the Hedgehog game and, to some extent, Sonic Heroes as well. But I think Sega has started to repair the damage caused by those games, by releasing Sonic Colors and Sonic Generations. As long as Sega keeps the quality up then I see no reason for that to be necessary.
-
- Dead House
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:33 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: does this meen sega does not own sonic any more?
I agree...as long as they hold this level of quality there's no need to park him...jus don't go back to any of those crappy formulas and let sonic do what he does best...run lol...i do however think that if well thought out another adventure title could be good...jus I
prove writing gameplay and voiceacting lol
prove writing gameplay and voiceacting lol
- RiilihShimo
- stalker
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:05 pm
Re: does this meen sega does not own sonic any more?
Sonic is Flo's buddy.
Remember 9/9/99 forever. Keep dreaming.
08/16/11[<3]
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lets-brin ... 6857503202
08/16/11[<3]
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lets-brin ... 6857503202
Re: does this meen sega does not own sonic any more?
RiilihShimo wrote:Sonic is Flo's buddy.
Did you hear about the new gigantic multimedia trademark SEGA just filed?
- RiilihShimo
- stalker
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:05 pm
Re: does this meen sega does not own sonic any more?
MrSega wrote:RiilihShimo wrote:Sonic is Flo's buddy.
Did you hear about the new gigantic multimedia trademark SEGA just filed?
Yep.
Remember 9/9/99 forever. Keep dreaming.
08/16/11[<3]
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lets-brin ... 6857503202
08/16/11[<3]
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lets-brin ... 6857503202
-
- Feet of Fury
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 6:20 pm
Re: does this meen sega does not own sonic any more?
MrSega wrote:Did you hear about the new gigantic multimedia trademark SEGA just filed?
Oh goody are you going to spam post it here as well?
Oh joy!
BTW are you ever able to stay on topic? Just wondering...
- RiilihShimo
- stalker
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:05 pm
Re: does this meen sega does not own sonic any more?
stu wrote:MrSega wrote:Did you hear about the new gigantic multimedia trademark SEGA just filed?
Oh goody are you going to spam post it here as well?
Oh joy!
BTW are you ever able to stay on topic? Just wondering...
I know what you mean ... Ive seen it everywhere o_O
Remember 9/9/99 forever. Keep dreaming.
08/16/11[<3]
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lets-brin ... 6857503202
08/16/11[<3]
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lets-brin ... 6857503202