Roareye wrote:but with GC component cables at around £200 ATM I can see the appeal for cost.
Just imagine being in america where if you want to use rgb on any console you need to either pay $200 for an upscaler or pay $500 for a pvm
Moderator: pcwzrd13
Roareye wrote:but with GC component cables at around £200 ATM I can see the appeal for cost.
Ragfish wrote:Roareye wrote:but with GC component cables at around £200 ATM I can see the appeal for cost.
Just imagine being in america where if you want to use rgb on any console you need to either pay $200 for an upscaler or pay $500 for a pvm
Roareye wrote:Of course PAL had the issue of 50hz instead of 60hz.
2koolpa wrote:This dude really wrote a series of novels about the Wii only doing composite video, and it was the crux of his entire argument lol. Now that wii component suddenly exists, it's "worse" than gc.....
And the objective vs subjective thing... I can name incredible Wii games that I don't even personally like. That isn't a contradiction.
There are good games that I don't like.
There are good games that I like.
There are bad games that I don't like.
There are bad games I do like.
Objectively I can say a game is good or bad, subjectively I can say whether or not I like it/enjoy playing it.
It was shovelware, no better than those AtGames controllers you plug direct to your TV. Game developers knew it too, and it was a machine filled with shovelware.
Nintendo released some good games for the Wii. Nintendo always had a knack for that, still do. Outside of their "Nintendo Difference" era, they are generally consistent as some of the best game developers out there. However unlike the N64 era where each unique title was able to stand out and shine, several titles of quality were lost in the quagmire of the shovelware on the Wii. Especially those developed by people outside of Nintendo such as No More Heroes and Mad World.
Ragfish wrote:Here's a comparison between the Wii and Gamecube video output so you can decide for yourself.
https://i.imgur.com/euQS9M7.gif
Keep in mind that this image is zoomed in very far and showing an extremely simple picture, so any differences would be less significant in practice.
jasondaigo wrote:mazonemayu wrote:5) the wii u’s maximum resolution is 720p, this is called “hd ready”, it is not hd...
1080p is called Full HD, it is not hd
Ian Micheal wrote:There is quite a big change on the ps2 is very blurry talking on a pal crt back in the day compared to the dreamcast output the ps2 looked like i need to take the vasoline off the crt
Users browsing this forum: No registered users