Akura has all that nonsense yeh? (No scanline fan either, and I've four CRTs!)
I thought just beams 480p over HDMI cord too no upscale
Best Cost-effective VGA Option?
- mistamontiel
- Shark Patrol
- Posts: 2153
- Dreamcast Games you play Online: Errythan except Tetris o.0
- Location: Miami, FL, CUBA
- Contact:
- Roareye
- Rank 9
- Posts: 929
- Dreamcast Games you play Online: Chu Chu Rocket, Quake 3, Monaco GP 2, PSO, Planet Ring, Toy Racer, Worms World Party
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: Best Cost-effective VGA Option?
Hmmm. Perhaps I've got the details wrong. As I say I use it with an MCable for reduced lag, so I'm likely getting the resolution show up based on the cable. Either way the Akura avoids the issue of the screen shunting to the extreme far top-left - something no VGA to HDMI converter has ever done (that I've tested).
-
- noob
- Posts: 3
Re: Best Cost-effective VGA Option?
My image is centered.Roareye wrote:Hmmm. Perhaps I've got the details wrong. As I say I use it with an MCable for reduced lag, so I'm likely getting the resolution show up based on the cable. Either way the Akura avoids the issue of the screen shunting to the extreme far top-left - something no VGA to HDMI converter has ever done (that I've tested).
Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
-
- Carnage
- Posts: 617
- Dreamcast Games you play Online: Gundam
Monaco Online
Pod
Maximum Pool
Planet Ring
Pso
Toy Racer
4x4 Evo
Re: Best Cost-effective VGA Option?
I know someone will bash at me but...
I bought a kaico hdmi box for 25€ (i had a 5€ ebay voucher, generally it's 30€) and for as little as 25€ it produces the best image quality i've ever seen, the image is very crisp and i cannot really complain
I am no lag expert but doesn't seem to be any
The only downside is that it does not work on one of my samsung tv but i don't care cause i don't use that tv
Now, i don't know if it's better than an hanzo or an akura but surely for 30 bucks gives me an image my old vga box (the transparent one you can now find on ebay for about 50€) could only have dreamed for
Now bash at me for buying kaico products xD
I bought a kaico hdmi box for 25€ (i had a 5€ ebay voucher, generally it's 30€) and for as little as 25€ it produces the best image quality i've ever seen, the image is very crisp and i cannot really complain
I am no lag expert but doesn't seem to be any
The only downside is that it does not work on one of my samsung tv but i don't care cause i don't use that tv
Now, i don't know if it's better than an hanzo or an akura but surely for 30 bucks gives me an image my old vga box (the transparent one you can now find on ebay for about 50€) could only have dreamed for
Now bash at me for buying kaico products xD
-
- noob
- Posts: 3
Re: Best Cost-effective VGA Option?
I'm having the Bitfunx HDMI cable for Dreamcast, the graphic is same as VGA cable with slightly less over-contrast, the only downside is the stereo channel being reverse channel. The Left and right channel is reverse order and I have no ways to fix it. My RGB cable is working properly on the audio but for Bitfunx HDMI cable just seems weird. Any solution on it?
- fafadou
- Leonard Nimoy
- Posts: 1856
Re: Best Cost-effective VGA Option?
Still using my vga "cabou" cable until my compatible tv will passed away.
For me it's better than akura and other hdmi cable, those have a darker screen, like you notice.
Best result except fabulous dchdmi.
For me it's better than akura and other hdmi cable, those have a darker screen, like you notice.
Best result except fabulous dchdmi.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 10 Replies
- 11876 Views
-
Last post by Agnostic X